Dear Sir,
May I take issue with the adverse comments in response to
the sentencing of a taxi driver after an horrific accident. (19/1)
***
Whilst I have every sympathy for the bereaved relatives,
bereavement's no qualification of road safety and sentencing. On the contrary road
safety and sentencing cannot be based on raw emotion at all. As for BRAKE, apart
from their declared green environmental policy against motor transport, what
exactly is their qualification in road safety and sentencing? In their
predictable and shrill demands for tougher sentencing of drivers, they ignore
some perspective which, In fairness to your readers, needs some
balance.
***
If it were not for drivers, the economy would collapse
over-night and we would begin to die in large numbers from lack of basics like,
food, water, heat, medicine, healthcare and so on. So drivers keep far more
alive than they kill and are not the enemies of the State that anti drivers
claim. In fact there is less death on the road, from all causes, after 300
billion driver miles a year than from accidents in the home. Are there such
shrill calls for imprisonment for home owners then? Of course not! So clearly
this concern for life is selective and against drivers.
******
Why should one driver have an accident where, for just
bent metal, the police are not even concerned but from exactly the same scenario
and actions, by virtue of the terrible coincidence that human flesh intervened,
there are calls for heavy terms of imprisonment? Thank goodness the courts are
beginning to understand this it seems.
****
The fact remains that when society, from necessity,
encourages humans to operate dangerous machinery with other humans intermingled
accidents and bad things will happen. Can we really incarcerate people for doing
their best but still making mistakes and getting it wrong? If that were so we
would all be in jail for mistakes. Although convicted of careless driving, which
is not based on fact but subjective opinion, unlike evidence of murder for
example, this was still an unintentional accident in a scenario that society
allows.
***
Wishes
| ||
Saturday, 19 January 2013
Taxi driver kills for £35
Labels:
amateurs,
Punish v Prevent
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Kill someone in ANY other way and you're looking at a very heavy sentence. Why should there be one law when a person is 'in control' of a motor vehicle and another for everyone else?
ReplyDelete