I have already been able to cite individual police forces who are determined to pretend that 'speeding' causes accidents and are simply unable to confess or admit that when speed is extremely high, it's dangerous driving not speeding. See N.Yorks Police cannot acknowledge Dangerous Driving
If these so called 'extreme speeders' crashed and killed anyone, the charge wouldn't be Death by Speeding' See the three offences of speed here.
Look at these Tweets here:
And This NPCC release It starts off:Here at @PoliceChiefs & @ChiefGlosPolice refuse to acknowledge dangerous driving to promote speeding profiteering!. https://t.co/W01Dd5DleR— Drivers E. Midlands (@EastMidsDrivers) February 26, 2016
Speeding is an offence and officers will always seek to deal with it appropriately
@PoliceChiefs 'Extreme speed'? That's dangerous driving & not 'speeding' @ChiefGlosPolice is admitting 'speeding isn't an accident cause!— Drivers E. Midlands (@EastMidsDrivers) February 26, 2016
@ChiefGlosPolice @PoliceChiefs Having detailed to you how speeding, simply to exceed a number cannot cause a reaction, you deny physics?>— Drivers E. Midlands (@EastMidsDrivers) February 29, 2016
It's about time Ms Davenport was stood down from a post for which she seems unable to understand the law and the objectives of it.@ChiefGlosPolice @PoliceChiefs > If your 'extreme speedster' killed someone it would be death by dangerous so why do you talk in riddles?— Drivers E. Midlands (@EastMidsDrivers) February 29, 2016