IPCC refuse complaint only on a technicality

It seems the Anti Driver Brigade, putting genuine road safety last as usual, are salivating about the IPCC decision not to uphold an appeal against North Yorkshire Police who did use a bereaved to promote a false road safety and driving statement. For these stupid people,

the law is that until NYP sue me for that last remark, it is a matter of fact.

For the full story go to Our page here and of course our blog story that replaced the original one that someone had caused to be removed Here 

Of course the NYP would deny having anything to do with the removal of the first report, but let's not be in any doubt, there is a massive and corrupt 'Speeding' Industry out there that depends on speeders to sustain itself. We have been able to show that the system is now very much based on a regular turnover from speeders and this means that there isn't an incentive to stop or cure speeding but to actually cause it. See Speed inducement sites

As I regularly point out, if there is a high number of speeders being generated at a site, something is going wrong so why let it continue? It means that speed policy at the site is failing. If these were accidents, would police just take pictures or find out why they're happening and correct it? So what is happening is that speeding is mercilessly being allowed to continue so that lots of money is being made by the Industry. This is a big story about big money. Little wonder then that a blog page suddenly disappears and the police resort to angry name calling then is it. 

Little wonder then that my complaints about unspecified officers of NYP were unanswered initially either. But I persisted, pages were replaced, reminders were sent.

For the record, apart from calling me names, 'Abusive', 'Vexatious' and 'Oppressive', at no stage did NYP deny that 'speeding' cannot cause accidents. They tried to say it was the bereaved's fault for contacting them so that they could misuse his grief. It wasn't for him to know that speeding cannot cause anything, but it certainly was for NYP RPU to know. Either way they used a bereaved to promote very profitable false road safety policy. Will they sue me for saying that? Of course not. It's the truth

The IPCC only refused my appeal on a technicality, however I am confident that if police repeat these false statements about 'speeding' the IPCC have a better understanding of the serious nature of the false statement. In the meantime, on IPCC advice, I have raised this matter to a higher level. 

One of the serious effects of pretending that 'speeding' causes accidents, is that it deflects, as in this case, from the real accident cause which was dangerous driving and nothing more can exemplify this very worrying trend whereby Careless and dangerous driving, which both cause fatalities are excluded from the Fatal Four campaign yet 'speeding' which causes nothing has been included. When the Speeding Industry can blatantly promote their income like this at the expense of real accident causes, the time has come to kill the Speeding Industry and all its profiteers with it. It is deadly serious. While they make money, people are being maimed and killed because the real causes are being ignored. . 

It is also a worry that the authorities behind the Fatal Four campaign, especially Leicestershire's Fire Chief, have refused to answer my very polite concerns about their part in this. Read more here 

But silence obviously means reluctant assent. If LF&R & NYP are unable to deny that speeding cannot cause anything then, in the name of road safety, they should confess it. Take it from me, this lie will need to be laid and the Corrupt Industry that benefits from it, must be dismantled as soon as possible.

If you agree with me, then please help by taking it up with your politicians and making a donation to our campaign for genuine road safety at Motorists & Drivers Union Home Page

Poll: Should police tell truth?

In the meantime they can only call me silly names for being right about them.