Parliamentary Advisory Council Transport Safety. Don't they sound grand?

Although they sound very important and official, PACTs is nothing more than another self appointed tax relief quango and profitable roads safety charity that Parliament

 takes very seriously for some reason, even though they are really a lobby group for all sorts of road safety profiteers. Get  some idea of what we mean here And here you can see more of the bogus road safety profiteer vested interests too.

One major issue I have always raised in road safety is that it's the only life and death activity, with the addition of mass prosecution, where we allow every Tom Dick and Harry with no CV in the subject such a major say on it all. This opens the door for charlatans, profiteers and ideologists to run major infrastructure to the danger of the public and at massive disadvantage to the economy and community. 

There is no question that this is now how our roads are being run and as a result people are dying who shouldn't be, and many thousands of drivers are being oppressed, harassed and prosecuted who shouldn't be. 

We should have much more efficient and less costly road safety than we currently have and yet there are multi billions being wasted on anti driver ideology; most of which stops not one single accident. 

PACTS are very much the UK leaders in all this. 

They fail to acknowledge undoubted accident and casualty causes that would be cheap to address and yet promote profiteering from non accident causes.

They refuse to acknowledge that without all of UK's drivers, particularly the private car driver, our society and economy would collapse totally and that in their focus on low road casualties, many caused by a refusal to address causes, they ignore that drivers actually keep all 65 million of us alive. 

PACTS have dishonestly compared road casualties with their favoured Rail and Air casualties, ignoring that, unlike roads, planes and trains do not share paths with opposing traffic, animals, and humans mingled in. More importantly, they do not count casualties of road journeys specifically part of a rail or air journey as rail and air casualties. Rail and air journeys start from the home not just from a terminus.  

Here is some more on PACTS.

http://kspeat.wix.com/driversunion#!pacts-chart/cfqs

http://driveeastmidlands.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/pacts-not-satisfied-with-casualty.html

Here's PACTS exploiting grief and lots more.

Now look at this sequence of PACTS Tweets to me on all this. 

A host of medical professions, road safety charities, motoring groups and emergency services support a #lowerlimit | https://t.co/s9WYmKrQhe pic.twitter.com/h90GKtpGt6

— IAS (@InstAlcStud) October 10, 2016

@InstAlcStud @R_S_P_H @Allianz @roadvictims @racfoundation @IAMRoadSmart @UK_AHA @PFEW_HQ @TheBMA @PACTS Vested interest, ideology, & no CV

— Drivers E. Midlands (@EastMidsDrivers) October 10, 2016

so what does @EastMidsDrivers recommend to reduce drive deaths?

— PACTS (@PACTS) October 10, 2016

@PACTS How about less of this? https://t.co/HmFL5XBp5o

— Drivers E. Midlands (@EastMidsDrivers) October 10, 2016

@EastMidsDrivers - entirely unhelpful and unconstructive as usual

— PACTS (@PACTS) October 10, 2016

@PACTS You're the people who frauduelnetly don't count road accidents, solely part of rail & air journeys, as air & rail casualties.

— Drivers E. Midlands (@EastMidsDrivers) October 12, 2016

@EastMidsDrivers Oh dear. Insults, ignorance, paranoia - no room for dialogue

— PACTS (@PACTS) October 12, 2016

@PACTS You refuse to discuss proven expert fact & valid points but call that paranoia instead. If it's so untrue sue me.

— Drivers E. Midlands (@EastMidsDrivers) October 14, 2016

So all the evidence, facts, research on these three massive sites is 'Paranoia' according to the bogus road safety profiteers exposed within. 

www.driversunion.co
www.DriveEastmidlands.com
www. https://sites.google.com/site/driversprotestunion/

These Tweets prove PACTS' attitude to fact and clear evidence provided on the basis of independent non vested interest expertise. Perhaps you may be able to get your MP to inquire into the activities and objectives of this group.