Brexit. What the f...k just happened? If you don't know. we're still at square 1.

      

Theresa May will now be our leader to take us forward.

I won't congratulate her for, what she has picked up, is a poisoned chalice.

She needs our prayers for herself and for guidance, not just for getting us, in the UK, through this mess without loss, but for the advancement of all Europe.

So long as she puts British interest first, this vote to leave the EU can give her the power to force, FIFA like changes, to the similarly corrupt EU as we decide our options.

Theresa has the chance to save the EU, providing that, in a new form, if we are to consider staying at all, the UK has top seats at its top tables with veto power too.

She would be betraying her people now if,  as a starting point,  instead of demanding the utmost, she just settled for some token changes; little more than the insults hapless David Cameron was sent packing with, from the EU.

The problem is that most people have no idea what happened and why it did. Perhaps we will make better judgments for our future if we look at it all from the start.

Prior to the appearance of the single issue Nigel Farage and his mates, we were all bumbling along living our lives pretty successfully, dealing with and solving our problems without much care about who was running it all. 

Yes there were things we hated without really knowing who to blame. But leaving the EU was only the objective of Nigel Farage and his followers. To get us out was their sole raison d'etre. They didn't believe that they would do it though.

What jolly japes? Go for the relatively easily won seats in the EU Parliament -British voters don't mind a bit of fun at unimportant polls - get there, cause mayhem with massive perks for doing so, and without an obligation to take anything seriously, even boycott meetings and have fun doing it. But it was a power base that gave them exposure and funding from which to build.

Build they did. UKIP became a household name and was now taking seats at local elections with a large slice of the vote in all elections.

Silly David Cameron thought it a wizzo idea to promise us a Leave EU Referendum in his election manifesto, to pinch Farage votes. Thinking, at best, he'd be saddled with another Clegg style Coalition and so would be stopped from keeping his promise by the Lib. Dems who were Europhile. Except he won outright and horror of horrors, had to keep his promise.

That a Government, meant to govern for the best, should then turn to Joe Bloggs to decide such a crucial issue for the country is a dereliction at least, but when believing, as Cameron clearly did, that to leave the EU would be suicide, it amounts to unforgivable irresponsibility. Quite simply, we shouldn't have had a referendum at all. We elected Cameron to govern us. He didn't even have an economic plan for us outside the EU right up to the time of voting. 

Having traipsed around the EU and returning with his empty begging bowl, Cameron had placed us all in a no win situation. 

 Although I don't like the EU, like most who voted to remain, I could never see how the UK now could possibly subsist outside of it. 

My rationale was that the dirty deed, the treachery had long been done. Successive leaders from Heath on-wards, Wilson, Major, Blair, Kinnock and so on had sold us out long ago. It was all too late now. We'd been sold out years ago.

We were no longer the Queen of the Seas, with a massive army and air force. I always take a 'bottom line worst case scenario' approach to any decision. So we leave the EU and Spanish Trawlers invade our fishing grounds. What do we do? Do we blow them out of the waters? Where's our Navy to keep Spain out of Gibraltar? Will America still help and support us to keep the Falklands?  Will anyone help us from the Western World? A gun boat defence of our domain takes us to war against the EU and how do we win? Who will aid us? All Farage seemed to talk about was self rule, borders, immigration, trade but not how we defended the independence he sought. 

Once Cameron had called his Referendum, there was no choice but to vote to exit the EU. We were already being abused by The EU, even though the second largest net contributors to it, as poor relations with no say. 

Goodness, had we voted to stay for more of it, that's exactly what we would have got. Not only from the EU but from the rest of the world too.  

Yet all we were voting for was to empower our Parliament, our Prime Minister, our MPs in Europe and the rest of the world. What sensible true British people could possibly vote against that? Why was this wickedly kept from the British people during the campaign but instead they were being told that it was an irreversible suicide. It never was.  See from 25th May I was pleading for honesty on this point. Despite the dishonesty, the nation still  voted to leave the EU.

Clearly the UKIP people who fought so hard to take us from the EU, were not prepared to follow it through.

 One after another they have stood down from leading the nation that stood by them. What an utter disgrace! So were UKIP serious about their claimed raison d'etre? Did they have any plans? Apparently not.

And all this division in the Nation, all this cost, all this upheaval was basically created by one man, Nigel Farage, who has never even been elected to Parliament! Can you believe it?  

So what should Theresa do now? 

Well Nigel Farage has shown clearly the damage that a single issue minority lobby group can do to stability and the status quo. This applies to all single issue minority lobby groups. The unrest with the UK salt of the earth normal mainstays of our country, who expressed the unrest with their votes of the 23rd June, must be heeded. And it starts within. 

'Getting Britain back' was about getting it back into the hands of the steady dependable majority that it and Theresa needs and out of the hands of the single issue selfish minority lobby groups that it doesn't need at all.  

When placating a group is at the expense of costing lives, and costing the community so much that we don't have money in the NHS to save more lives, then not only are we disadvantaging the majority, but it's counter productive too. Theresa mustn't be frightened of being called 'Nasty'. We cannot base policy on silly name calling. See we can't base policy on silly names! 

Let's drop Common Purpose, Metropolitan Elitism in the UK now. And let's start in the police Theresa.

 We need to clear out the hierarchy of the current NPCC and get police backing the whole community without its current corrupt policies.

She must clear out all of the Common Purpose officials, who were actually the cause of this widespread unrest and get the Britain at home to what the majority of British people support. At the moment UK's 35 million essential driver voters are being marginalised and oppressed by unrepresentative police.  

See your corrupt single issue policing here.

If Theresa  doesn't take the UK back to a UK preferred status quo then there's little point in BREXIT at all. Only on this basis can we look at our approach to the EU. See how we must get normal rational majority back in charge

For starters we must not rush, or be pushed into invoking article 50. That takes away our negotiating hand and is irrevocable. Had Nigel Farage and UKIP still been leading us with this, perhaps they did at least qualify to urge a headlong leap before we're ready. In abandoning us, they gave up that right in my view. Article 50 Beware-false-profits-bearing gifts Theresa.

Theresa should now ignore the EU officials, unless they ask to speak to her, and now talk to the European Leaders on an individual basis with a view to a complete new economic union in Europe with much more autonomy and self rule of its member states and where the UK is a major player with powers of veto. 

What we must not do, is to leave the EU until all avenues have been explored.

What we have done, is to empower Theresa to name our price and have just made her the most powerful woman in Europe & indeed the world.  She mustn't just hand that back. 

 Theresa we do want you to be 'nasty'. We don't want you to roll over like a vicar's daughter to lobby groups. You are not Justin Welby, 

you are a politician and a Prime Minister. since when was politics ever about being nice? 

The C of E is ashamed of British normality and no longer thinks it's English anyway.

One thing is for sure. Our Parliament has been ordered and mandated to take us from the EU under its own Referendum Act 2015 no matter what lawyers are trying to say. And no General Election can change that. 

At any time in the future that we are still in the EU and we are still being abused, the opposition will have no difficulty in raising that fact to whoever is in Number 10.

This vote has done one thing. It has restored power to our Parliament that the EU must now take seriously. What can possibly be wrong with that?

As for Scotland and Northern Ireland. They're covered In this post here Theresa. Northern Ireland would never vote to leave the UK, and we'd be better off if the Scots did but they know where their bread is buttered, so won't listen to little Nicola. 

Petition to overturn democracy refused.

Further to my post about this divisive Parliamentary Petition to overthrow a Parliamentary Referendum. See it here.

See Petition here

Why hasn't the Government response had the Media exposure that the Petition itself has? It's been kicked into the Long Grass.

Do ask if they'll mention it. While at it, ask Theresa May, who says she's so keen to make Brexit work, why she hasn't caused this divisive Petition to be removed already?

 

Government responded

The European Union Referendum Act received Royal Assent in December 2015, receiving overwhelming support from Parliament. The Act did not set a threshold for the result or for minimum turnout.

The EU Referendum Act received Royal Assent in December 2015. The Act was scrutinised and debated in Parliament during its passage and agreed by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The Act set out the terms under which the referendum would take place, including provisions for setting the date, franchise and the question that would appear on the ballot paper. The Act did not set a threshold for the result or for minimum turnout.

As the Prime Minister made clear in his statement to the House of Commons on 27 June, the referendum was one of the biggest democratic exercises in British history with over 33 million people having their say. The Prime Minister and Government have been clear that this was a once in a generation vote and, as the Prime Minister has said, the decision must be respected. We must now prepare for the process to exit the EU and the Government is committed to ensuring the best possible outcome for the British people in the negotiations.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

The Committee has decided to defer its decision on this petition until the Government Digital Service has done all it can to verify the signatures on the petition. We have already had to remove 77,000 fraudulent signatures. The Committee wishes to make clear that, although it may choose to schedule a debate on this petition in due course, it only has the power to schedule debates in Westminster Hall – the second debating chamber of the House of Commons. Debates in Westminster Hall do not have the power to change the law, and could not trigger a second referendum.

The Petitions Committee will look at the petition again at its next meeting, on Tuesday 12 July.

Get the serfs and common people back into their cages fast.

Catalogue of events:

Before the vote on the 23 June, not knowing that the result would be to leave the EU, I wrote of a united Britain to move forward together to make The Nation's choice work and be a success.  Here it is.

I am so shocked, despite my appeal, that since then, the reverse happened immediately. So I had to write this on the 24th

What was worse, that during the Referendum campaign, there was misinformation and fear being promoted by the the Remain group, led by our Prime Minister

 and Chancellor of the Exchequer no less, who unlike the other side, should've shunned any dirty tricks and mendacity and they were aided by Media too. I was forced to respond to biased broadcasting and presentation of vague predictions in the form of fact.  

Let's remind ourselves of the advantages Remain gave themselves.

For a start they used civil servants for a month of unofficial campaigning before it became illegal, including £9000,000 on a pamphlet at our expense. Remember?

They included Gibraltar, who would predictably vote to remain to a man.

They included fifteen years of ex pats who love Britain so much they'd left it, but still like to have their cake and eat it and were bound to be Remain.

Then realising the young, with no experience of democracy outside of the EU, bringing up a family  running a home and easier to scare about the their 'unknown' may not turn out to vote at all, so what did they do? They wickedly divided them from their elders who love them, in favour of trusting a whole load of alien old people in Europe instead!  This divisive ageism was unforgivable. See this example of it. 

They ran a last minute media campaign on the 9th June  to get the dilatory and unworthy people, who'd already had four months to register by computer, by midnight that day. And so the Server crashed two hours before midnight. So the irresponsible dilatory, including many who hadn't bothered at all, were given another 48 hours to boost the Remain cause. Here's what should've happened.  

They told the biggest of all lies in their biggest threat to the people. 'LEAVE MEANS LEAVE' Cameron told us 'I will start the process immediately'. I constantly appealed to Media to challenge the lie but they were complicit in it too. See for yourselves

We all went to the polls, including the Scots and Northern Irish and all the Remain supporters and despite all the lies, the stunts, the voters who shouldn't have been polled, the Country still voted 52% to leave. 

Since then there has been a consistent attempt to reverse democracy, stir up unrest and division and official actions to make the fear predictions a reality by undermining our currency and stability.  See Lord Haw Haw was hanged for less. 

So having frightened thousands of Brexit voters into doubt and regret, they then call to re - run the whole thing on the basis of their own construction. While at the same time   Parliament has been running an anti Parliament Referendum petition and refuses to take this divisive challenge to democracy down!     

So we can see what has been going on. The bureaucratic ruling Aristocrats have realised that if they don't ruin all this, they will never get the Little People back into their pens where they like them to be.  

Now we're being challenged with legal action at our expense. See here and Here on totally fallacious arguments.   

The foregoing is an undeniable record of events so far. Can anyone doubt how desperate the profiteers, undemocratic and Britain haters, are to get us back into the EU and into their serfdom as soon as possible? 

What I find incredible is that the Left Wing Socialists hate Britain so much, that they too prefer the people to be subjugated in this way as well. Jeremy Corbyn and his party have weighed in against the common people to the extent that, they have broken apart, not on the basis of 'In or out' but that Jeremy didn't do enough to keep its people ruled by the alien and unelected of the EU. The one chance that Labour had to free the people, and they blew it. 

Who really is behind the post Brexit breakout of racialist activity? Brexit have won. They're not the angry and bitter ones. Why would they be raining on their own parade? Yet we are being encouraged to assume that some Brexit inspired Fasicm is now at work. 

Enter Theresa May. Theresa May represents the very rotten edifice of all that, not only took us into the EU, but kept us there too. See Britain Under Theresa 

Fact is that, if The Conservatives make her Prime Minister and she doesn't take us from the EU to our best advantage, and doesn't reverse all the other anti community common purpose policy that has caused all this, they'll not only be thrown out in 2020, but having shown that they aren't a party of the People at all, they will never return to power again.  

Great Britain Under Theresa isn't just a fear factor or a prediction. 

A picture speaks a thousand words

They still don't get it! 

When people said 'they want their country back' it wasn't just from the EU but from all the silly common purpose idealism of Metropolitan Elitism that they do not associate with at all.

With Brexit Theresa May became Yesterday's Woman.

Anti democratic anti Britain QCs falling out of wood work for loadsa money.

Yep it's Sky News again, hosting a very lefty looking anti Brexit QC to tell us of his further stream of cases against the British for being democratic and this on top of the Mishcon de Reya  case I have covered already here . 

Either way, win or lose for them, we could lose our freedom and democracy, the lawyers always make a bundle of money from such actions.

For starters if they are successful, it will not affect them as it will us, the struggling majority, who are affected much more from being in the EU than very wealthy people are.  Make no mistake, these actions against us will cost all of us but not them.

I wonder if, as it's about our freedom and democracy, we should bring in lengthy jail sentences for such speculators if they don't prove their case? Would they be so keen to take us all on? There's no downside for these people?

They are fomenting anarchy and revolution See we hung Lord Haw Haw for less

The QC given too much time to spout his anti British case by, yes Kay Burley of course, was Jolyon Maugham QC.

Some background on Maugham here.

A Labour Party Advisor, who according to this report had been presented as independent and, although talking about politics and constitution, his speciality is finance.

Ok part of his 'cast a big net something will come in' strategy to try us for, was the one already dealt with in the other post, that 'no PM had the mandate to invoke article 50 because things may have changed by then'. Sorry but he's wrong.

The referendum, until we have another to cancel it, is a permanent mandate and obligation on Parliament and yes, whilst he talks of Parliament's Sovereign power, that is only by consent of the Sovereign. If the Queen would be so ready to abandon her people for 600 rowdy squawkers, then we may as well ditch the Monarchy altogether.

He talks of Scotland, Gibraltar and Northern Ireland. But they, like Mr Maugham accepted the Referendum as UK citizens and voted in it. Why didn't Mr Maugham and the three provinces raise all this before they lost the vote? Why didn't they stop the Referendum in its tracks? Why did they take part at all?

I think there is no problem for loyal Ulster dwellers to stick with the UK. 

So far as Scotland are concerned, the majority of Scots didn't vote to remain as there was a low turnout. As for Gibraltar, what's their issue? Britain or the EU? Spain will take them like a shot. They cannot have it both ways. UK or Spain; their choice.

But here's where Maugham's case fails. Democracy is fine for his boss Jeremy Corbyn to cling to power, fine for the Remain side in Ulster and Scotland and Gibraltar but it doesn't count for the whole of the UK because it doesn't suit his case? Are you sure you have thought this through Mr Maugham?

As it happens, EU, with Greece on its hands, needs a subsidised Scotland additional basket case economy on its hands like a dose of TB. So we are stuck with the Scots; they are too canny to leave the UK SNP or no SNP. Oh whatever happened to the Mid Lothian Question by the way?

Then Maugham throws in for good measure the big lies of the Brexit group that 'misled so many people'.

No-one I know has fathomed what was so outrageous about Nigel Farage's Poster. A long line of people, and yes, that had been seen on eastern EU borders, nothing offensive in text, and certainly no Nazi Storm troopers pointing machine guns at them. So wasn't the outrage a bit effected and manufactured?

£350 million a week cost of the EU?  Hang on. Don't we reduce footballer's annual salaries to weekly rates when discussing it? What about our yearly utilities bills? Don't we talk about that in terms of weekly or quarterly? Of course it isn't £350 million a week but an average of the gross; that's easy to understand. In actual fact, when we get rid of all EU costs, there will be a lot more than £350 Million a week available for all kinds of projects.

But lies are totally subjective. A lie from one person's perspective is the truth from another's; that's where this old red herring must fail. Are we seriously going to measure lies to change such a crucial decision?

What about Osbourne's idle threat for an emergency budget on a Brexit win?

What about all the financial statements based on 'could' and 'may'? It 'could' cost us £4900 per year per household? All these 'coulds' and 'maybes' were then played as fact to scare would be Leave voters.

But the biggest lie, by David Cameron, was that a vote to leave would mean leave instantly, when in fact, as events have now proved, it was another blatant scare lie.

As I kept pointing out, from 25th May, it was only a mandate to empower our Parliament and its politicians with a very powerful tool for the UK I asked what right minded pro British politician or voter could possibly not want a more empowered UK? Please see it here And this was kept from the people by the pro remain anti British Media and the Remain Group. How many more people would've voted to leave had they known there was nothing to lose?

So let's get this option nailed straight away. The biggest lies and the biggest vote changers came from the Remain side. How will we ever know how many would've changed on either side? So that is a totally futile proposal to put to any court. Please have more respect for us Tax Payers will you?

Again we are being lied to. The Government is still running an anti Brexit Petition which theoretically should reach at least 15 million people - possibly much more because people who were ineligible in the Referendum are now voting in this poll- but what does this prove? If 15 million voted 'no' in the real thing, why would we expect less in this one?  Someone in a high place is running it against the people. See I have tried to have it closed.  And here is evidence how this bogus irrelevant petition is being misused. Who in Parliament wants a petition against a Parliamentary Referendum? Why isn't the Media asking?

So lets keep our eyes open for the rich lawyers subverting the will of the people to be even richer. And what Judges are selected to rule on it.

And can we ask the Candidates for Prime Minister to pledge total unequivocal support for the Referendum, our withdrawal from the EU, and that this futile, dangerous Parliamentary Petition is closed immediately. 

None of us honest Little People can afford any of these stupid actions. 

They're telling you porkies again: Parliament has already voted to invoke article 50

The incredible legal challenge to prevent the Government from taking us out of EU.

Will Sky bother to explain that, when Parliament passed the Referendum Act 2015, they didn't make it conditional on the result. They voted to accept & abide by it. They have voted to support Article 50 being invoked.

Where in the Act is the proviso that Parliament decides whether we invoke Article 50 as they are claiming? 

Parliament, The Lords and House of Commons should have stopped us from having a referendum to leave the EU, (on demand of the people),  then and there but by supporting it they they accepted the outcome.

Any doubts that are now within the British people have been sewn by the persistent post Brexit fear campaign that I predicted prior to the Referendum.  See it here So here are the enemies of Britain in all their glory. For their own purposes they want to frighten their cap doffing serfs back into their plantation.

For how long is this divisive insurrection by undemocratic media and individuals  to be tolerated by our leaders, The Queen & current Prime Minister David Cameron? Where are you Cameron?

If the multi millionaire of the Dodgy Dossier, Iraq Dead, Tony Blair is behind this, it's not for your benefit. He couldn't be trying to be the People's hero again just before Chilcot by any chance?

Look, why didn't these top lawyers and politicians think of this before they lost the Referendum? Why did they scare us that 'a leave vote was irrevocable'?  At that time they were telling us all that a vote to leave meant leave immediately weren't they? See I warned you all this on 25th May.  It's time for doubters to believe the evidence of how you are now being used against our own country by a desperate band who want you back in your cage. 

Prime Minister? Is he hiding or still fighting the referendum behind closed doors?   see. Time for Queen to step in Time for Queen to step in.  And how we hanged Lord Haw Haw for treason

So we have been running Britain by calling each other nasty names.

I've lifted this from my Post exposing Theresa May's unsuitability to run this Nation:

'Theresa herself saddled them with the term 'The Conservative Party is the nasty party' The very rhetoric of the unrepresentative left wing haters of normal people. That's how the Metropolitan Elite operate. Call the normal 'extreme' or a list of other common insults, and before we know it, we're all falling over ourselves not to be normal. When individuals fall for it is bad enough but to run a country to please silly name callers and banner headline writers is a dereliction of responsibility.'  See the full post here.

Anyone who sticks their heads above the parapet, on social media, in politics or publicly is very familiar with ridicule, bile, personal attack, abuse and deliberate misrepresentation. It amuses me how some public figures take this so seriously: Even report it to police sometimes.

My answer is to ignore it in the confidence that what I am doing or saying is pleasing many more than those being offended. I don't even bother to read my incoming replies mainly because I just do not have enough time and no staff to be able to do so. Of course this means I miss all the compliments and supporting posts too which is a dreadful shame.

Any politician who is frightened by silly name calling and untrue soundbite response, really has no business to be in Parliament. Most, like me are totally impervious to it and too thick skinned to let that bother them...............until it's about their party. Then it all changes.

Whole policies can be changed for fear of how they will play and actually are changed after silly name calling. In effect we have been governed not on what's best for most of us and the Nation but on what silly remark or untrue claim can be thrust at The Party in Government. The person who can make the best retort, whether appropriate or irrelevant get's the cheer. One only needs to watch PMQs to see it quite often.

Politics and Government should be about a popularity contest where they are popular with the majority. Anything else isn't democracy.  Politicians cannot grasp that single issue minority lobby groups make much more noise than the ordinary working population, the silent majority, who are very angry when this fear of being called something 'nasty' can actually disrupt a party and change their life as if they were of no consequence. It is this anger and frustration that was reflected in the Brexit result. The people hated what had been going on for too long and rejected the whole package.

This woolly appeasement has not only ruined Government but has divided the Anglican Church for the very same reasons. Just see the comparison with the steadfast Roman Catholic Church. They don't budge on central policy, everyone knows where they stand and they thrive.

It has been a gross dereliction of every politician who has preferred slick soundbite and insult before truth to run our Country. And so it is divided. We have created a selfish nation who have no idea of democracy and take to the streets when it isn't to their liking.

We now have twenty four hour media who really believe that, because they can fill a studio or radio phone in with democrats and minority activists in equal measure, they are being balanced when they are not representative of the Nation at all. They even think that they are popular when in fact they are angering far more people than they are pleasing most of the time. See Haw Haw Media. 

Can we seriously run a country like the UK on the basis of silly name calling and unrepresentative media? Of course not.

Our new Prime Minister and the ministers are going to have to address that soon. Theresa May is certainly not to be trusted with that task. 

Theresa is the Queen of nasty name politics. She invented 'Conservatives are the Nasty Party' 

If they want to unite the nation they should understand that the vast majority of the UK hated the EU and wanted us to leave but 48% had been scared against voting to leave  by scare tactics and the deliberate lie that a vote to leave on the 23rd was more than merely a permanent mandate to our Parliament to take us out at any time in the future. That was the biggest lie and it was from The Remain side. I raised this on the 25 May here.

Theresa May for UK's 35000000 drivers? She's your problem mate.

Why allowing Theresa May,

who didn't support Brexit, to take over, will be bad for UK's 35 million drivers and have us back in the EU within ten years.

For the Conservatives to elevate the Remain Theresa May to lead us through Brexit would be an insult and betrayal of the Referendum, democracy and a Common Purpose, Metropolitan Elite snub to the UK and its people.

The Conservatives must understand that the Referendum wasn't just about Brexit; it was a rebellion of the public, in great numbers, in their first opportunity, against everything wrong in their lives and to which they have never had any say.

Theresa May represents the very rotten edifice of all that not only took us into the EU but kept us there too.

Clearly thinking that Brexit would be a loser, and David Cameron a winner and to remain as her boss, she supplanted her moral instincts for those of her instinctive political survival with a view to succeed him, and so hung her flag to his greasy Remain pole. She backed the wrong horse. Remain lost and Cameron stood down.

What a cheek. Realising it's now or never, and there's nothing to lose, she has put herself forward to lead the Conservative party on a road and journey for which she has no real interest.

So who is the Theresa May who now wants to lead the Government and its people from one of the most elitist bastions of Common Purpose? 

Given that this embryo rebellion of dissent was mostly about all the wrongs here at home as well as in the EU she has been our Home Secretary allowing most of it.

Let's understand this, if we do not tackle corrupt liberal elitism and Common Purpose at home, we may as well stay in EU since we will be back there pretty soon.

If the Conservative Party elect May as their leader, not only will they snub 17 million voters and UKs 35 million drivers, they will be putting Party before people. Are they that so short sighted?

Theresa herself saddled them with the term 'The Conservative Party is the nasty party' The very rhetoric of the unrepresentative left wing haters of normal people. That's how the Metropolitan Elite operate. Call the normal 'extreme' or a list of other common insults, and before we know it, we're all falling over ourselves not to be normal. When individuals fall for it is bad enough but to run a country to please silly name callers and banner headline writers is a dereliction of responsibility.

I am not about to attack any single issue group; especially Gays. But what I do attack is single issue groups being forced on us by and within public institutions. It fosters dissent and protest from the majority who are then told to shut up and worse, even be prosecuted for protesting. That is Common Purpose and liberal elitism in action. Theresa May represents that.

Just complaining about our police being made to look silly and unrepresentative now draws bile and abuse. And yet this is what our police have become under May   I am likely to be abused or even arrested for raising it under May. There will be no outrage when I am assaulted  and threatened for it because this country has not stood for 'Stale, pale, male' and his wife and family for many years.

That's what Brexit was all about. A revolt against the whole rotten Common Purpose edifice that got us there and kept us there, and Theresa May was part of that.  

Seriously; is this  how the majority wish to see their police?

 Of course the new age Piccie, tweety, selfie silly social media nonentities may justify it as 'it's nice' but we don't pay police to be nice, to abuse our uniform and property on a selective single issue basis. Whatever they do off duty and out of our uniform is fine by me. 

I also resent having to pay for these special interest groups within the police too. They are divisive; we just want one type of copper; happy, well paid and doing the job with advancement based on meritocracy and nothing else. It seems this isn't May's ideal at all. 

When I served, we couldn't use police property or write anything public as police without consent for very good reasons. Nothing reveals the mindset, often anti driver, than police, especially senior ones. tweeting without checks. So there's another May failure as Home Secretary. Too much PR policing and tweeting instead of actual policing. 

Theresa can call me 'nasty'  for saying what 99% of the nation, and I imagine of the police service feel, but if I didn't have a strong sense of what's right and what the majority want to read, then I wouldn't be writing this.  

Attack UK's drivers and you attack the community:

More important, than the EU, believe it or not, for the ordinary family is their transport, their motor car, and their driving. Look how under Theresa's watch, the oppression and corruption of policing UK's drivers has flourished.

Just look at our two sites Drivers Union and This blog site. Both are full to the brim with the dishonesty, profiteering and ideology against road safety and driving. None of it is opinion and much actually points fingers at powerful individuals and associations. Just pick any Topic Label on this blog to see how corrupt it all is.

How do we get away with it if it's untrue? Surely if we are wrong, we should be told why. Yet we are not even challenged by any authority on it.

Even the exploitation of bereaved families are used to sustain speeding profiteering under May. See the case here

This open letter to the Head of Roads Policing  which contains much of the whole sordid story is still unanswered, under Theresa May, even though it's asking for good road safety ideals and less profiteering from driver oppression. 

Here, from our sites,  are some samples of Common Purpose anti driver ideology that May has ignored or allowed against noble people. 

If it wasn't careless before fixed penalty fixed penalty cannot make it so'

Illegal and fraudulent speed courses

Police use bereaved to falsely promote speeding revenue

Using cyclists to curtail driving

Britain under Theresa May. 



Theresa's message?  Moonies to the normal people




Police playing games with our lives.

Why are drivers arrested when in shock and trauma

So Theresa May proves to be just like her Boss David Cameron whose policies pandered to the anti driver minorities of the liberal elite and Common Purpose and also demanded longer jail terms for accidents too.

Michael Gove has said he isn't just going to fiddle around with minor adjustments to make things appear to comply with Brexit. He is going to change all the enemies within that got us there and kept us there. That is what we must do. We must clear out the old musty ideology of the left, not be afraid to say the unspoken word and clean Britain up from bottom to top. 

We must start by making media and the police more patriotic and representative of the Nation. No more 'Jairmany Calling, Jairmany Calling.' Haw Haw Broadcasting Co media and policing against the community. Under Theresa May that's how it's been.

It says it all that The Guardian and BBC want her to lead us. 

Are the Conservatives really thinking of keeping us in a May La La Land ? 

They have a choice. Share the nation's votes with five other parties under a tired old loser, or kick off with 17 million votes by fully supporting Brexit and giving the UK back to the little people who actually keep it running.

If Conservatives select Theresa May Ukip will be fighting them at every election. Is that what they want? Will they grasp this nettle?